|
THE
DAVE CLARK 5 - CATCH US IF YOU CAN
Let’s
start with a relevant Jack Kerouac anecdote: sometime during the 1960s –
when Kerouac was staying with his mother in Northport, Long Island – he
opened the front-door to a gaggle of young, would-be rebels who, like so
many others, had crowned him as some kind of countercultural tsar. In this
particular case, the youthful cohort were uniformed in black leather
jackets, with up-turned collars testifying to their poseur cool. As one
– and all grinning – they swung around to reveal the words “Dharma
Bums”(1) made out in studs across the backs of their jackets. Kerouac
slammed the door in their faces. We can guess at the source of his
frustration and dismay: the underground had become legitimate;
non-conformity had become conformism; and all the good work had been
misappropriated and twisted beyond recognition.
Despite it being a “pop musical” starring the Dave Clark Five, John
Boorman’s debut feature, ‘Catch Us If You Can’ (1965), shares
Kerouac’s disillusionment and joins him in slamming the door on 60s
youth culture. That decade’s hipsters are dismissed as the “products
of affluence,” and their rebellion is as superficial as the studding on
those leather jackets. Indeed, an early scene in the film's breezy,
Godardian(2) first act shows the coolly-beautiful couple – Steve (Dave
Clark) and Dinah (Barbara Ferris) – tearing through the streets of
London in an E-Type Jaguar, whilst shouting at pedestrians through a
megaphone, “Change your way of life!”
|
So unthreatening
– and so photogenic – is this brand of rebellion that it can be
commoditised, packaged and sold, sold, sold by the “square”
capitalists. Capitalists such as the advertising executive Lenny (Lenny
Davidson), who employs Dinah, Steve and the rest of the Dave Clark Five as
the faces of a campaign promoting meat. This appropriation of youth
culture – and that culture’s complicity – only serves to strengthen
the dominant system. Boorman’s camera lingers on the monolithic office
blocks and the serried ranks of cars, leaving us in no doubt as to which
Will has Triumphed here. Even when the youngsters decide to leave all this
behind – going AWOL from their advertising work, in search of a rural
paradise – they discover that there is no true escape (and the film
accordingly shifts into melancholy). Dinah is everywhere recognised as
“that Butcher Girl,” and the media interest in their desertion is
exploited by the suits as yet another way to sell more meat…
This pessimistic message is intelligent, off-beat and – given that
‘Catch Us If You Can’ was released at the optimistic height of the
“Swinging Sixties” – brave. However, it does launch a peculiar irony
into the centre of the film: that is, whilst 'Catch Us If You Can'
criticises the exploitation of youth culture by the moneymakers of this
world, it is guilty of much the same crime by using the Dave Clark Five as
a hook for the youth dollar (the band aren't playing themselves, so there
is little other reason for their involvement). In the end, this film –
despite its youth pretensions – is just another money-spinner for the
men-in-suits.
This irony may be either irresistible or totally damaging, depending upon
which way one approaches it. Myself, I am inclined to take a charitable
view, and believe that this inner tension makes 'Catch Us If You Can' an
even more intriguing product of its time. Besides, it is not inconsistent
with Boorman's later work: only two years later, audiences would witness a
fully-fledged Cinema of Irony in his masterpiece, ‘Point Blank’
(1967). And so – though it may be mishewn – 'Catch Us If You Can'
still stands as an interesting signpost at the start of a remarkable
career.

|